Legal Opinion

Baum v. Baum

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1959No. Civ. 23076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying the “plaintiff’s motion to appoint a receiver of, and/or order a sale of defendant’s interest in the partnership of J. H. Baum and Sons, charging said interest under section 15028 of the Corporations Code with sums theretofore ordered paid by defendant to plaintiff and made a lien on said partnership interest, and that such lien be foreclosed and a sale of said interest had.”

The plaintiff and the defendant were formerly husband and wife. One child was born as the issue of the marriage. Certain orders were made by the trial court wherein the defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Baum v. BaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wilkins v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Slevats v. FeustalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Newhall v. NewhallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Simonet v. SimonetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API