Legal Opinion

De Croupet v. Frank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hunt (Ormond F.), J. Assumpsit by Jacob DeCroupet against Anna Frank for money had and received. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

In the summer of 1916 Christian De-Croupet died. He had, some four years prior to his death, incorporated the DeCroupet Iron Works, with a capital of $25,000 (250 shares at $100 par each). Of this capital stock he held in his own name at the time of his death 240 shares, Frederick Hesse held 5 shares and Charles Frank held 5 shares. By the terms of his will, a daughter, Elizabeth DeCroupet, received 96 *466shares; a son, Jacob DeCroupét (plaintiff herein), received 96 shares; and a daughter, Anna Frank (defendant herein), received 48 shares. Through the consent of his sisters, plaintiff, in the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Nims v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Murphy v. McGrawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Davis v. StrobridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. De Moss v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Kuchenmeister v. DuszaMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mineau v. BoisclairMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Okulich v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Adams v. Edward M. Burke Homes, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API