Legal Opinion

De Moss v. Robinson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1881PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Y an Burén. AssuMPsrr. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Harriett De Moss having received $900, offered to give it to the plaintiff in error, who was her father-in-law, “ on condition that he should make his will giving his property to his two children (one of them the husband of Harriett) equally in case her husband survived her, and in case she survived her husband then that plaintiff in error should will his property equally, to the remaining son and *63herself.” This proposition seemed to have been satisfactory, the money was paid over and a will afterwards made and executed, which the testator offered to read to Harriett, but she expressing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faxton v. FaxonMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Mundorff v. KilbournCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. Gould v. MansfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Jilson v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Martin v. Wright's AdministratorsNew York Supreme Court · 1835

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. CarmichaelMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Sammon v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Peoples Savings Bank v. GeistertMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Rookstool v. NeafSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API