Legal Opinion
Miller v. Pancucci
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 21, 1992No. SACV91-255-AHS (RWR)PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
RONALD W. ROSE, United States Magistrate Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs commenced this action by filing a complaint on May 7, 1991, alleging civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, municipal liability, and claims under the Court’s supplemental jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1367. The case is in the discovery stage and this motion seeks an order compelling the City of San Bernardino, Paul Panucci, Patrick Pritchett, and Gwen Lucas [Defendants]1 to produce certain…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Tuite v. HenryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Caver v. City of TrentonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Rogers v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.