Legal Opinion
Hidahl v. Gilpin County Department of Social Services
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 16, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-C-1537PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARRIGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Jack and Cindy Hidahl commenced this civil rights action, on behalf of themselves and their two children, alleging that state and local officials violated their constitutional rights by improperly: (1) conducting a child abuse investigation; (2) filing a dependency and neglect action; and (3) removing the children from the Hidahls’ home. Defendants are the Gilpin County Department of Social Services, the Colorado State Department of Social Services, the Gilpin County Board of Commissioners, the Gilpin County Board of Social Services, and various Gilpin…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Branson v. NottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Hidahl v. Gilpin County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hon v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Daugherty v. Westminster Schools, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997
- DeShiro v. BranchDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.