Legal Opinion
Hon v. Marshall
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 10, 1997No. B088602PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRANDLIN, J. *
Plaintiff Juanita Hon appeals from that portion of the judgment awarding attorney fees in the amount of $12,000 to defendants John Marshall, M.D., and Michael Barry as the prevailing parties under Government Code section 12965 (section 12965). She contends the trial court erred in making the award. We agree and remand for further proceedings.
Facts
The underlying facts are uncontroverted. On May 28,1993, appellant filed suit against her employer, Lifeblood Trust, which had terminated her employment on February 2, 1993, and respondents, who, according to appellant’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Janken v. GM Hughes ElectronicsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Branson v. NottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chavez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Pfeiffer Venice Properties v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Knight v. Hayward Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Linsley v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Tipton-Whittingham v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.