Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Idaho State Bar

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2004No. 29003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

ON THE BRIEFS

This appeal arises from an attorney discipline matter before the Professional Conduct Board of the Idaho State Bar. A Hearing Committee of the Professional Conduct Board determined that Defendant A violated Idaho Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5(f) (Rule 1.5(f)) by failing to produce an adequate itemization of the legal services provided and the fees charged to Robert Wilhelm (Wilhelm) and that a private reprimand be given. Both Wilhelm and Defendant A appeal.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant A represented Robert Wilhelm (Wilhelm) on two felony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Runsvold v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Matter of MalminIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. a v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Idaho State Bar v. MalminIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Idaho State Bar v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. A v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Idaho State Bar v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Idaho State Bar v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Idaho State Bar v. DodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In Re DodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API