Legal Opinion

Idaho State Bar v. Malmin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2003No. 28364PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an attorney discipline case in which the attorney seeks review by this Court pursuant to Idaho Bar Commission Rule 511(i )(5). Following a hearing before a three-member hearing committee of the Idaho State Bar Professional Conduct Board (PCB), the PCB found the attorney guilty of three counts of attorney misconduct and recommended sanctions. This Court agrees and imposes the recommended sanctions.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Constance Malmin (Malmin) was charged with three disciplinary offenses based on her client dealings with Vicky J. Hill (Hill). The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of JenkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Idaho State Bar v. WarrickIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Warner v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Idaho State Bar v. SouzaIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wilhelm v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Idaho State Bar v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Idaho State Bar v. EverardIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Idaho State Bar v. DodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API