Legal Opinion

A v. Idaho State Bar

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2004No. 30376PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a recommendation of a Hearing Committee of the Professional Conduct Board of the Idaho State Bar. The Hearing Committee found that the attorney engaged in conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice and recommended that he receive a private reprimand. The attorney, who was prosecuting a defendant in a criminal case, obtained a transcript of the grand jury testimony in that case without an order of the court and then gave a copy of that transcript to a third party engaged in civil litigation against the same defendant. We affirm the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Matter of LutzIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Idaho State Bar v. EverardIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re DodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. SinghIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Idaho State Bar v. DodgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API