Legal Opinion

State v. Poirier

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 4, 1989No. 7678PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of offering to make home improvements without being registered in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 20-427 (b) (5). The dispositive issue on appeal is whether General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 20-427 (b) (5) prohibits a person, whose certificate of registration has expired, from making or offering to make home improvements. We find that it does.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. In July, 1980, the defendant registered as a home improvement contractor with the department of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Dukes v. DuranteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. ParmaleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. City of Shelton v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Calabrese v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API