Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Borger Steel Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1977No. Appeal, No. 1575 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Borger Steel Company (Borger) appeals to this Court from a decision of the Unemployment Com*77pensation Board of Review (Board) which held that George Ilgenfritz, representative claimant for approximately forty employees of Borger, was eligible for unemployment compensation benefits during a six-week labor dispute because he was out of work as a result of a lockout.

Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Law), 43 P.S. §802(d), provides that:

An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week—(d) In which his unemployment is due to a stoppage of work,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Kendall Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Small Tube Products, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Chambers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Odgers v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kerner v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Local 730 v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Grimm v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Jehn v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API