Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Borger Steel Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
Borger Steel Company (Borger) appeals to this Court from a decision of the Unemployment Com*77pensation Board of Review (Board) which held that George Ilgenfritz, representative claimant for approximately forty employees of Borger, was eligible for unemployment compensation benefits during a six-week labor dispute because he was out of work as a result of a lockout.
Section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Law), 43 P.S. §802(d), provides that:
An employe shall be ineligible for compensation for any week—(d) In which his unemployment is due to a stoppage of work,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Kendall Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Small Tube Products, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Chambers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Odgers v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Kerner v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Local 730 v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Grimm v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Jehn v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.