Legal Opinion

Henry v. Gulf Coast Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1916No. 6917PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by the Gulf Coast Drilling Company against F. S. Henry. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CLAY, C.

For convenience the parties hereto will be designated as in the trial court, plaintiff and defendant, respectively. This action was brought by the Gulf Coast Drilling Company, plaintiff, against F. S. Henry, defendant, for certain sums claimed to be due for drilling two wells, furnishing certain material for the same, for the time lost while drilling, agreed to be' paid by plaintiff, and for a certain discount of a note, agreed to be paid by plaintiff. Defendant demurred to plaintiff’s petition, which demurrer was overruled, and, he electing to stand on his demurrer,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Gilmore v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Kuchler v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ruby v. WarriorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Blasdel v. GowerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Dowler v. State Ex Rel. PruntySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Griffin Grocery Co. v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. McCosar v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API