Legal Opinion

In Re Petition

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1948No. 31341PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The real question of law in this case, presented by the record, is the validity of the decision of the Court of Common Pleas that the order of injunction, alleged to have been violated by Stott, did not, and could not, become operative so as to control or affect his conduct until the filing of the journal entry in the office of the clerk of courts, which was October 1, 1946; and that on September 30, 1946, the date of the alleged commission of the wrongful act charged in the original motion for an order in contempt, there existed no valid or effective order of injunction.

That view very…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Webb v. Western Reserve Bond & Share Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Curran v. BrookesOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Porter, Exr. v. LerchOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Curtiss v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Jensen v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Walker v. GiardinaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Scioto Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Price WaterhouseOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hendershot v. HandlanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API