Webb v. Western Reserve Bond & Share Co.

Two questions were argued and presented to this court for determination: (1) The power of the trial court, after term, to enter the nunc pro tunc judgment of February 3, 1923, and its. effect upon the parties to that suit; and (2) whether such nunc pro tunc entry can affect strangers to that suit, where such strangers are found to be pre-existing creditors who had knowledge at the time their attachment suits were filed “that all parties to the original suit had supposed that the judgment ran against John A. Logan.”

First. It is claimed that the trial court had no power to modify its judgment…