Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Curtiss v. Erickson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1912No. 9761PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered January 24s, 1911, convicting the defendants of contempt of court, after a hearing on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

C. J. Erickson, a general contractor, had the contract for excavating a part of the Lake Washington canal. Carlson was a foreman who had charge of a part of the work. On October 22, 1910, the case of Bilger v. *640State, 63 Wash. 457, 116 Pac. 19, was pending in the superior court of Thurston county; and upon that day, the matter coming on for hearing upon the application of the plaintiffs for an order enjoining defendants from removing the embankment between the excavated portion of the canal and-Lake Washington, the court, being satisfied that such removal might tend to lower the waters of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bilger v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Jensen v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Robertson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  2. Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Walker v. GiardinaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Dependency of AKWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In re the Dependency of A.K.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API