Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Fechtel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1977No. 74-6296, SC 24711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for damages for legal malpractice. The defendant attorney represented the plaintiffs in this case in an earlier real property foreclosure suit in which they were the defendants. At the time of that foreclosure suit, plaintiffs were in default under their land sale contract in that they had missed one payment on the purchase price and had allowed the taxes on the property to become delinquent. The trial court decreed foreclosure. In this case, plaintiffs contend that defendant was negligent in not raising an issue of waiver with respect to the installment payment and in not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Blondell v. BeamOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Kincaid v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Norton Et Ux. v. Van Voorst Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martinson Bros. v. HjellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Salishan Hills, Inc. v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Lorenzen v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API