Legal Opinion

Norton Et Ux. v. Van Voorst Et Ux.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land brought by the assignees of the vendees against the vendors. The trial court decreed specific performance, and the vendors appeal.

Following is a copy of the contract:

“THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this 19th day of March, 1945, by and between S. W. Van Voorst and Emma Van Voorst, husband and wife, Parties of the First Part, and Frank Cecil Samson and Yerda Rae Samson, husband and wifé, Parties of the Second Part,
“'WITNESSETH
“That for and in consideration of the covenants and stipulations herein contained,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hays v. HugOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Long v. StormsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Roth Development, Inc. v. A. R. John General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Arnold v. FechtelOregon Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API