Davis Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
Where the maintenance of a multiple family dwelling —in other words an apartment house — -was a nonconforming use in a single family district under the provisions of a zoning ordinance, but was in existence at the time of the enactment of the ordinance, may it subsequently increase the number of its apartments? This is the sole question involved in these proceedings.
No. 501 Paxinosa Avenue, in Easton, is a lot 100 feet ■in front and 130 feet in depth and on it is erected a large dwelling house. At the time of the adoption, by the City of Easton of a zoning…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- HUMPHREYS v. Stuart Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Cheswick Borough v. BechmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Firth v. ScherzbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Silver v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Township of Chartiers v. William H. Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- MacK Zoning AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.