Legal Opinion

Firth v. Scherzberg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1951No. Appeals, 239 and 240PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff (joined later by a number of co-complainants) sued to restrain the defendants’ use of an unimproved piece of land in Philadelphia as a terminal parking place for tractor-trailer trucks. The complaint averred that the use so made of the property constituted a nuisance per se} being an alleged violation of a municipal zoning ordinance, and also a nuisance in fact.

The defendants Scherzberg, husband and wife, jointly purchased a portion of the property in question in 1924. From the time of this acquisition, the husband used the property as a storage or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. HUMPHREYS v. Stuart Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Valicenti's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Cheswick Borough v. BechmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Huebner Et Ux. v. Phila. Sav. F. Soc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. Township of Chartiers v. William H. Martin, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Gross v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Muehlman v. KeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1971

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API