Zamloch v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
This cause is before us on a motion to remand the case to the trial court in order to permit appellant to move for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. • :■
During the time Rule 11(3) was in effect such was the proper procedure and this court so held in Wagner v. United States, 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 801. Rule 11(3) provided: “A motion for a new trial solely upon the ground .of newly-discovered evidence may be made within sixty (60) days * * * unless an appeal has been taken and in that event the trial court may entertain the motion only on remand of the case by the appellate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Rakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. MinkoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- UNITED STATES of America v. Arthur S. LOWELL, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Miguel Moran Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Robert A. Frame, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.