Legal Opinion

Zamloch v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1951No. 12753PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is before us on a motion to remand the case to the trial court in order to permit appellant to move for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. • :■

During the time Rule 11(3) was in effect such was the proper procedure and this court so held in Wagner v. United States, 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 801. Rule 11(3) provided: “A motion for a new trial solely upon the ground .of newly-discovered evidence may be made within sixty (60) days * * * unless an appeal has been taken and in that event the trial court may entertain the motion only on remand of the case by the appellate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Rakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  3. Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. MinkoffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. UNITED STATES of America v. Arthur S. LOWELL, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Miguel Moran Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. Robert A. Frame, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API