Legal Opinion

United States v. Carr

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1894No. 360PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming. This was an action by the United States against Thomas J. Carr, Charles F. Miller, Luke Voorhees, Elias W. Whitcomb, and John W. Collins, on the official bond of said Carr as United States marshal, wherein tbe other defendants were sureties. Defendants’ answer claimed credits for certain fees and other compensation as due said marshal.

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming. This was an action by the United States against Thomas J. Carr, Charles F. Miller, Luke Voorhees, Elias W. Whitcomb, and John W. Collins, on the official bond of said Carr as United States marshal, wherein tbe other defendants were sureties. Defendants’ answer claimed credits for certain fees and other compensation as due said marshal. The circuit court, on trial without a jury, allowed part of said credits, and rendered judgment for the United States for the residue of the amount claimed. The United States brings…

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, District Judge.

This was a suit by tbe United States upon the official bond of the United- States marshal for the territory of Wyoming, which was executed by the marshal and his sureties, the defendants in error, on the 23d day of August, 1886. For a breach of the bond, tbe government alleged that tbe marshal bad failed and refused to pay over to the proper accounting officers of the treasury department of the United States the sum of $773.11, which was the property of the United States, and which it was his duty as marshal to so pay. The defendants admitted the receipt *803by the marshal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bond v. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States v. EliasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Andes v. SlausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. v. HensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  5. Rush v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woodbury v. City of ShawneetownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  2. City of Harper v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. D. J. Moore Grocer Co. v. Pacific Rice MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Cudahy Packing Co. v. Sioux Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  5. Municipal Excavator Co. v. SiedhoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API