Legal Opinion

Municipal Excavator Co. v. Siedhoff

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 4, 1926No. 7154PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to a judgment affirming the report of a referee, which awarded recovery to defendant in error, plaintiff below, in an action on contract. The action was commenced in the state district court of Sedgwick county, Kan., by defendant in error against plaintiff in error and Lillian L. Derr. The defendants removed the cause to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas, on the ground of diversity of citizenship.

Neither in the pleadings nor in the removal papers do jurisdictional facts sufficiently appear; but no question of jurisdiction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bond v. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Shipman v. Straitsville Central Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Roberts v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  5. Rush v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Akre v. Liberty State Bank of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. Desha County v. Crocker First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Manzo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Noone v. SinnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API