Legal Opinion

In Re Bernard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 13, 1979PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

When a trial judge sees a breach of decorum as contempt of court requiring summary treatment at his hands, not infrequently the atmosphere is highly charged and the time for reflection and review is very limited. While the trial judge has both the power and the duty to so control the proceedings before him that an orderly trial, as well as a fair trial, will be achieved, significant issues of due process will often arise as he summarily disposes of the contempt matter.

Such a case is this.

In 1977 in Superior Court in Oxford County John J. Bernard, Chief of Police in Mexico,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Town of Nottingham v. Cedar Waters, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of RossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. Wells v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  4. State v. DeLongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API