Town of Nottingham v. Cedar Waters, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This is an appeal from a finding of contempt arising out of a dispute concerning enforcement of the zoning regulations of the town of Nottingham. We reverse the order below and clarify the distinction between civil and criminal contempt.
The defendant Cedar Waters, Inc., is the owner of a mobile home, located in the plaintiff town of Nottingham in an area that is zoned “residential agricultural.” The plaintiff sought to enjoin the defendant from maintaining a mobile home in the town without having it placed upon a “continuous permanent foundation of concrete or any other masonry wall” as was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- State v. LinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Charles Cushman Co. v. MackesySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CorsettiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Brady v. SamahaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. DaveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- CONTEMPT IN STATE v. DewerthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- In re C.W.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.