Legal Opinion

City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 14, 1916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This case was considered at large in 221 Mass. 468, and it was ordered that a final decree be entered apportioning the costs of the construction, repairs and maintenance of Chelsea Bridge and of Meridian Street Bridge between the cities of Boston, Chelsea and Revere in certain percentage in accordance with the report of a commission. Thereafter, a final decree was entered, from which appeals were claimed by the city of Chelsea and by the city of Revere.

There can be no appeal from a final decree or judgment entered substantially in accordance with a mandate or rescript of an appellate court.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Day v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Stewart v. City of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. CamouSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Pizer v. HuntMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Samuel v. Page-Storms Drop Forge Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API