Stewart v. City of Kansas
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court under § 237, Judicial Code, ta review a judgment of the state court in a case involving the rights and duties of a county officer, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
This action originated in a petition for mandamus filed in the District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas, by defendant in error against plaintiff in error to require the latter to account for the .sum of $30,840.24 alleged to be due defendant in error under certain taxing statutes of the State.
Judgment was entered for defendant in error which was affirmed on appeal by the Supreme Court of the State. The case was then brought here.
Motion is made to dismiss, on the ground that no Federal question was raised or passed on by the state court, or alternatively to affirm the judgment.
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Braxton County Court v. West Virginia Ex Rel. State Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Attorney General of Michigan Ex Rel. Kies v. LowreySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Marshall v. DyeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Smith v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Railroad Co. v. County of OtoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Columbus & Greenville R. Co. v. Miller Ex Rel. Mississippi Levee Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wright v. WalcottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Virginia v. ReinhardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.