Legal Opinion
International Industrial Park, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 22, 2008No. 06-876LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*523 OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. The case presents Fifth Amendment taking issues arising from the activities of the United States Border Patrol (“Border Patrol”) on Plaintiffs 100-acre property, located in southern California near the border with Mexico. Plaintiff, International Industrial Park, Inc. («HP”), aPeggg that agents of the Border Patrol have entered HP’s property for many years in pursuit of illegal immigrants for roundup and arrest. IIP asserts that the Border Patrol’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Black v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- D & D Landholdings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- International Industrial Park, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bush v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.