Legal Opinion

Berg v. Ackman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1988No. C5-88-724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Harold and Bonita Ackman appeal a judgment in the amount of $33,166.65 entered against them on January 11, 1988. The trial court found that the Ackmans had breached a contract for deed for the purchase of farmland which they had entered into with Gary and Lorraine Berg on December 31,1981. The trial court ruled that despite their receipt of a quitclaim deed from the Ackmans, the Bergs had not agreed to rescind the contract and that they were entitled to damages for breach of the contract. It also found unpersuasive the Ackmans’ arguments of estoppel and waiver. We affirm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Desnick v. MastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Liebsch v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Nybladh v. Peoples State Bank of WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. Brunsoman v. Lexington-SilverwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goblirsch v. HeikesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Dunn v. National Beverage Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API