Goblirsch v. Heikes
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a district court decision that concluded Sylvan Goblirsch was entitled to receive $29,400 from Martin Heikes and Martin Heikes, Inc. The district court found that Goblirsch’s presentment of the checks more than five years after they were given as payment for three tractors was timely. We reverse the determination that the checks were presented timely, but remand for a determination on the liability for the underlying obligation by Martin Heikes, Inc., and Heikes personally.
FACTS
In the summer of 1988 Martin Heikes, president and sole owner of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wayzata Enterprises, Inc. v. HermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Gustafson v. Equitable Loan Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Commercial Investment Trust v. Lundgren-Wittensten Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Hart v. EastmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kohler Co. v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- Kohler Co. v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000