Legal Opinion
Bridgeforth v. Salazar
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 20, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-0080PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wayne L. Bridgeforth brings this action against defendant Ken Salazar, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., claiming racial discrimination and retaliation by his employer, the United States Park Police. Defendant has moved for summary judgment [Dkt. # 21]. Defendant contends that the incidents cited by plaintiff as examples of discrimination or retaliation are not materially adverse actions within the meaning of Title VII, and that they can be…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wayne Bridgeforth v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Taylor v. MillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ajisefinni v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Ajisefinni v. Kpmg LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sandra Greene// City of Austin v. City of Austin// Cross-Appellee, Sandra Greene, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.