Legal Opinion

Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of Commerce

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 15, 1945No. Gen. No. 43,401Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

August 10, 1944, Robert J. Graf filed his second amended petition (hereafter referred to as the petition) on behalf of himself and other stockholders, .alleging that he had paid more than his constitutional liability as a stockholder of the bank and that the amount of such overpayment be refunded out of the funds in the hands of the receiver to him and to other stockholders who are similarly situated. Hillmer,, and some of the other plaintiff creditors, filed their motion to dismiss the complaint setting up various legal grounds and on November 2, 1944, the motion was sustained, the petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of CommerceIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Holderman v. Moore State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of CommerceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Hillmer v. BishopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  5. Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of CommerceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API