Legal Opinion

Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of Commerce

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,575PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and other creditors of the Chicago Bank of Commerce, brought suit against former and final stockholders of the bank to enforce the superadded, constitutional liability of the stockholders. The cause was referred to a master in chancery who took the evidence, made up his report and recommended a decree adjudging defendants liable for certain specific amounts. The decree substantially followed the recommendation of the master, and certain of the stockholders prosecute this appeal.

The record discloses that the Chicago Bank of Commerce was organized April…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Sanders v. Merchants State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Heine v. DegenIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wheelock v. KostIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Burket v. Reliance Bank and Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of CommerceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  2. Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of CommerceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  3. United States v. GridleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API