Legal Opinion

Hillmer v. Bishop

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1942No. Gen. No. 42,096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

The Chicago Bank of Commerce was being liquidated by the Auditor of Public Accounts and creditors of the bank brought a representative suit against the former and final stockholders of the hank to enforce the constitutional liability of the stockholders. When the case reached the'Supreme Court it held the maximum liability of the stockholders was $100 per share “but it was enforceable at $100 per share to the extent of debts accruing before February 7, 1931; as to debts accruing after that date it was enforceable at a maximum of $50 per share.” Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of Commerce, 375 Ill.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stover v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of CommerceIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Sando v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  4. Gillig v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rickus v. RickusNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hillmer v. Chicago Bank of CommerceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API