State v. M. T.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The trial court committed appellant to the custody of the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) on the ground that, as a result of a mental disorder, appellant was dangerous to himself and others. Appellant assigns error to the trial court’s failure to provide him with information as required by ORS 426.100(1). For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the trial court committed plain error and reverse.1
The relevant facts are procedural and undisputed. Appellant came before the trial court for a civil commitment hearing. Appellant appeared via closed circuit television from the county jail. He…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. RitzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. MayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. TardanicoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- State v. BuffumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. MTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. J.R.B. (In re J.R.B.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. B. A. F. (In re B. A. F.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. B. K. (In re B. K.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.