Legal Opinion

State v. May

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1994No. 9403-95759; CA A83731PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, an alleged mentally ill person, appeals from a judgment of involuntary civil commitment. Because we conclude that the trial court erred in falling to advise appellant of her hearing rights, we reverse.

The state concedes that the trial court failed to explain to appellant her rights under ORS 426.100(1),1 as required by State v. Allison, 129 Or App 47, 877 P2d 660 (1994). The state contends, however, that any error was waived by counsel, who made no objection at the hearing.

We hold that a lawyer’s failure to object, standing alone, does not constitute a waiver of the right to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. RitzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. TardanicoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. TardanicoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. State v. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API