Legal Opinion

State v. B. K. (In re B. K.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 16, 2019No. A167703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, P. J.

*698Appellant appeals an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days pursuant to ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the trial court committed plain error when it failed to either directly advise him of information and rights specified in ORS 426.100(1) or conduct an examination on the record to determine whether he validly waived the right to be so advised. Specifically, appellant contends that the trial court plainly erred by failing to advise him that the possible results of the proceeding included voluntary treatment or conditional release. See ORS 426.130(1) and (2) (setting out…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. S. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. M. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. MTCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Y. B. (In re Y. B.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. State v. C. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API