Legal Opinion
DeClara v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 29, 1990No. 89 Civ. 7316 (RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”), Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (“MetroNorth”), Peter Stangl (“Stangl”), Thomas Constantine (“Constantine”), Raymond Burney (“Bur-ney”), and New York State (the “State”) move for dismissal of plaintiff Richard De-Clara's (“DeClara”) complaint, under either Rule 12(b)(1) or 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
Parties
DeClara is a former MetroNorth police officer, employed by MetroNorth from 1967 to 1989.
Defendant MTA is the administrative agency dealing with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shafii v. PLC British AirwaysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Verdon v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Shafii v. Plc British AirwaysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Dimino v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Sokolowski v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.