Legal Opinion
John Conard, Marshal of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Error v. Francis H. Nicoll, in Error
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 12, 1830PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
29 U.S. 291
4 Pet. 291
7 L.Ed. 862
JOHN CONARD, MARSHAL OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR
v.
FRANCIS H. NICOLL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.
January Term, 1830
1
ERROR to the circuit court of the eastern district of Pennsylvania.
2
The defendant in error brought an action of trespass, in the court below, against the plaintiff in error, for a quantity of merchandize, consisting of teas, cassia, nankeens, &c. all of the value of one hundred and ninety-three thousand seven hundred and twenty-five dollars. Also for four ships, viz. the Addison, the Woodrop Sims, the Thomas Scattergood, and…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Baldwin.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville & JamessonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Garey v. Union BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1826
- Conard v. NicollSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
3Cited by18 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Detroit Trust Co. v. the Thomas BarlumSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Robert Y. Brent, Surviving of Robert Brent, Use of the United States v. The President and Directors of the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Mothersead v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.