Legal Opinion

Riddle & Co. v. Mandeville & Jamesson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 13, 1809PublishedCited by 44 opinions

ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Columbia, sitting at Alexandria, in a suit in chancery, brought by Riddle & Co. against Mandeyille- and Jamesson, remote end.orsors of a promissory noté, dated March 2,1798, at sixty days, for 1,500 dollars, drawn hy Vincent Gray, payable tb the defendants or order, and by them endorsed’ in blank, Upon its ^ace h was declared to be negotiable in the bank of Alexandria, The note so drawn and endorsed was by Gray put' into the…

Read the full summary

ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Columbia, sitting at Alexandria, in a suit in chancery, brought by Riddle & Co. against Mandeyille- and Jamesson, remote end.orsors of a promissory noté, dated March 2,1798, at sixty days, for 1,500 dollars, drawn hy Vincent Gray, payable tb the defendants or order, and by them endorsed’ in blank, Upon its ^ace h was declared to be negotiable in the bank of Alexandria, The note so drawn and endorsed was by Gray put' into the hands of a broker who passed h,*0 D* Wi Scott for -flour, which he sold for 1,200 dollars in cash, and pdid the money to…

1Opinion of the Court

March 13.

Marshail, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court.as follows:

This suit is brought by the holder of a promissory note to recover its amount from- a remote endorsor. In a suit between the same parties, this court had previously, determined that the plaintiff was without remedy at law; . It is now to be decided whether he is entitled t'o the aid of a có.urt of equity.

■. 3Lf, as vas stated by. the counsel' for. the defendants, the question, is, whether a court of cbaiicery Would create contracts into which individuals had never entered, and decree the payment of money from person's who…

2Cited by44 opinions

  1. Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. In the Matter of Jan Alf Assarsson, Relator-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Sebree v. DorrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Moses v. Lawrence County BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. John Conard, Marshal of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Error v. Francis H. Nicoll, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API