Legal Opinion

Bolton v. SUPERIOR COURT (STATE)

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 7, 1997No. 1 CA-SA 97-0235PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

Defendant pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana having a weight of less than two pounds. Although this was her third conviction for possession of drugs, the plea agreement provided that “Probation is mandatory,” meaning that the parties intended for her to be sentenced as if this were her first conviction. The trial court refused to ignore the prior convictions; it rejected the mandatory probation provision of the plea agreement, then stayed sentencing so Defendant could file this special action. We accepted jurisdiction because the case raises an important question of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BenakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. Gray v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Mejia v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Raney v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API