Legal Opinion

Jaynes v. Jaynes

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1950No. Civ. 17361PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury. An appeal from an order of nonsuit in favor of defendant Frankie Dale Jaynes has been abandoned. This appeal concerns only the first cause of action of plaintiff’s complaint, wherein it was alleged that plaintiff, a 69-year-old woman inexperienced in business affairs, was induced by defendant, the brother of her deceased husband, to sell to defendant and his wife her shares in a family corporation which was engaged in the newspaper publishing business; that the inducement was by way of false representation as to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. O'Meara v. SwortfiguerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Taylor v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lazenby v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Brown v. HalbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Caruthers v. UnderhillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Renberg v. ZarrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Lomman v. Lieb, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API