Floyd v. EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL GROUP
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, judge.
Dianna S. Floyd (“plaintiff’) appeals from an Opinion and Award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission (“the Commission”) denying her claim for benefits under the North Carolina Workers’ Compensation Act for injuries sustained during an automobile collision. We affirm.
“[W]hen reviewing Industrial Commission decisions, appellate courts must examine ‘whether any competent evidence supports the Commission’s findings of fact and whether [those] findings . . . support the Commission’s conclusions of law.’ ” McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc., 358 N.C. 488, 496, 597 S.E.2d 695, 700…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Johnson v. Herbie's PlaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. CRAFT DEVELOPMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Powe v. Centerpoint Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Bentley v. Jonathan Piner Constr.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Charles v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Herbert v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009