Legal Opinion
Sinclair v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1920No. S. F. No. 9554PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate requiring the Secretary of State to receive and file the affidavit made by him for the purpose of conforming to the requirements of subdivision 4 of section 5 of the Direct Primary Law [Stats. 1911, p. 773] as a candidate for the Republican nomination for representative in Congress from the eleventh congressional district, and to certify his name to the county clerks of the counties of the congressional district to be printed on the ballot to be used at the primary election to be held on August 31, 1920, as a candidiate for said nomination.
It is…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Knoll v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- California Ass'n for Health Service at Home v. State Department of Health ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Bailey v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Knoll v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.