State Ex Rel. Bailey v. State Election Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an action in mandamus. Issuance of a writ is sought by petitioner through the exercise of original jurisdiction vested in this court by the Constitution (art. 7, sec. 2). Petitioner has filed a verified petition and the Attorney General makes response for the State Election Board.
The Attorney General, without waiving the right of respondent to defend for the board, states that objections are not made to the assumption of original jurisdiction. Since original jurisdiction, by the Constitution, is vested in the public interest, the court, by order, has elected to exercise it.
Attached to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Love v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Sinclair v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Smith v. BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Riley v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Harding v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Latting v. CordellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Murrow Indian Orphans Home v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946