Miller v. Miller
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
On January 6, 1909, plaintiff married defendant, and after a somewhat extended bridal tour, on which plaintiff spent practically all his savings up to that time, they finally settled in Haynesville, Claiborne parish. There plaintiff found employment as a railroad section foreman at ¿ salary of $50 per month, to w.hich he was able to add $15 or $20 more, as commissions on supplies furnished to his laborers, for which he stood guaranty. He never at any time earned more, except for .a short while when his salary was $57.50, and his commissions as aforesaid. This is his own testimony.
In February,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kittredge v. GrauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Wimbish v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- Keen Woolf v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Merchants & Farmers Bank v. McKellarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barker v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Succession of FarleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Phillips v. NereauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Strobel v. SchlegelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bond v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.