Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 1, 1926No. 25383PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

On January 6, 1909, plaintiff married defendant, and after a somewhat extended bridal tour, on which plaintiff spent practically all his savings up to that time, they finally settled in Haynesville, Claiborne parish. There plaintiff found employment as a railroad section foreman at ¿ salary of $50 per month, to w.hich he was able to add $15 or $20 more, as commissions on supplies furnished to his laborers, for which he stood guaranty. He never at any time earned more, except for .a short while when his salary was $57.50, and his commissions as aforesaid. This is his own testimony.

In February,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. GrauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Wimbish v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  3. Keen Woolf v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Merchants & Farmers Bank v. McKellarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Barker v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Succession of FarleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Phillips v. NereauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Strobel v. SchlegelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Bond v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API