Legal Opinion

Keen Woolf v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 1, 1926No. 25767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

The trial judge has correctly stated and disposed of this ease in a written opinion, which we now adopt as our own, to wit:

I

Statement of the Case. — This proceeding was instituted to compel the defendants in rule (R. E. Wyche and J. S. Rogers) to pay a judgment rendered against S. J. Caldwell, the defendant in the main suit, and on whose appeal bond they were sureties. The facts are undisputed, and the case was submitted on an agreed statement * * * which reads [substantially] as follows:

[It is admitted, that] in October, 1917, plaintiffs in rule (Keen & Woolf) sued S. J. Caldwell, the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holyoke v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Baker v. FrellsenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  3. Cornell v. . DakinNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Succession of DamicoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Southport Mill, Ltd. v. AnsleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Succession of PavelkaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Nicholas v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API