In re the Welfare of A.N.J.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
This appeal is from the juvenile court’s order referring a 19-year-old individ*890ual for prosecution in adult court. Appellant argues that the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction to determine the state’s adult reference motion because the state filed the motion after his 19th birthday. He also contends that the evidence and the law do not support the court’s reference order. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
On June 28, 1993, a juvenile female complained to police that while she was taking a shower behind a locked bathroom door in July of 1991, appellant (A.N.J.), who was staying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Matter of Welfare of DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- In Re the Welfare of J.L.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re Welfare of W. J. R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re the Welfare of S. V.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of V.D.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Matter of AnjCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Waynewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996