State v. Inthavong
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss his indictment. Because of fundamental error in the court’s charge to the grand jury, we reverse and order the indictment dismissed.
On July 7, 1986, a Hennepin County grand jury was impaneled to sit for 4 months. Judge Lindsay G. Arthur presided at the impaneling. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 628.56 (1986) and Minn.R.Crim.P. 18.03, subd. 3, the judge instructed the grand jury on its duties, choosing to do so orally in his own language rather than read from a juror’s handbook containing a proper written charge.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Jessie BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- State v. HockerArizona Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.