Legal Opinion

State v. Inthavong

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 27, 1987No. C0-86-1730PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

Defendant appeals the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss his indictment. Because of fundamental error in the court’s charge to the grand jury, we reverse and order the indictment dismissed.

On July 7, 1986, a Hennepin County grand jury was impaneled to sit for 4 months. Judge Lindsay G. Arthur presided at the impaneling. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 628.56 (1986) and Minn.R.Crim.P. 18.03, subd. 3, the judge instructed the grand jury on its duties, choosing to do so orally in his own language rather than read from a juror’s handbook containing a proper written charge.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. John E. Kenny, Trenton P. Oelberg, and William L. Parker, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Jessie BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. State v. HockerArizona Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. State v. PilcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API