Legal Opinion

Harriman National Bank v. Pope County

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The judgment of the circuit court was correct. Under article 16, § 1, of our Constitution, counties are expressly prohibited from issuing any interest-bearing evidence of indebtedness except in certain cases which are not necessary to a decision of the issues raised by the present appeal. County warrants are evidences of the indebtedness of a county. They are orders upon the treasurer of the county to pay out of its funds for county purposes, not otherwise appropriated, the amount specified. They are not negotiable instruments in the sense of the law…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wall v. County of MonroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Monroe County v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Bank of Commerce v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Vale v. BuchananSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmer v. Franklin CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Desha County v. Crocker First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. American La-France & Foamite Corp. v. City of El DoradoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. E. A. Martin MacHinery Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API