Legal Opinion

Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 2007No. A06-799PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant husband challenges the district court’s dissolution judgment and decree, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by awarding spousal maintenance in excess of respondent wife’s needs. On notice of review, respondent argues that the district court abused its discretion by not requiring appellant to maintain life insurance to secure the maintenance award. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining the amount of spousal maintenance, but abused its discretion by not requiring life insurance to secure the award, we affirm in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Arundel v. ArundelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Modrow v. JP Foodservice, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Marriage of Dobrin v. DobrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marriage of Maiers v. MaiersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. In re the Marriage of: DeWayne Stanley Farr v. Sophia Marie FarrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. In re the Marriage of: Hniya Abdenbi Kouttay v. Ali Jama YahiaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  4. In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell HareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan KvaalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API